Jedi Knight Army

He the spirit of truth has revealed unto me that I belong to and come from the "House of Israel". I was born into the Nation of Israel (ten lost tribes) that “I AM” set up from the beginning. All I am saying is that Abraham’s Father, Lord God (Guardian of Divinity) is the same God that I worship and follow. A Fifeshire Family: The Descendants of JOHN AND THOMAS PHILIP OF Kirkcaldy compiled by Peter Philip 1990. I am of Scottish Origins

Wednesday, 24 June 2020

Irish Lives MATTER too!!

The Irish slave trade began when 30,000 Irish prisoners were sold as slaves to the New World. The King James I  Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.

Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.
From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.
During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.
Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.
As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.
African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.
In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.
England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.
There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry.

 In 1839, Britain finally decided on its own to end its participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves.
 While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.
But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong.
Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories.

The Celts are Israelites Under Another Name.
 The word Celt is the Anglicised form of the Greek word Keltoi, which means "the people who are different.*" In Scripture, all nations, except the Twelve Tribes of Israel, are referred to as Gentiles (Foreigners), so the only people who are different are Israel. The word Celt is therefore another word for Israelite. The Celts are part of the Ten "lost" Tribes of Israel; as are the Tuatha de Danaan and Milesians. The Irish people are a mixture of Celts; Danaans; Milesians; Judah/Zarahites (of the "Red Hand" - Genesis 38:28-30§); (Dan-ish) Vikings and Norsemen and are all racially cousins.


* Deuteronomy 14:2 For thou [art] an holy people unto the "I AM" thy God, and the "I AM" hath chosen thee to be a peculiar* people unto Himself, above all the nations that [are] upon the earth.
* Special - 
Different (Oxford dictionary).

§ 
Genesis 38:28 And it came to pass, when she travailed, that [the one] put out [his] hand: and the midwife took and bound upon his hand a scarlet thread, saying, This came out first.
38:29 And it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his brother came out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? Why has thou made [this] breach against thee? Therefore his name was called Pharez (Breach).
38:30 And afterward came out his brother, that had the 
scarlet thread upon his hand: and his name was called Zarah (Scarlet).

(Please see "The True Origin of The Ulster Flag" article.)


Therefore the Celts, according to God, are Israelites.

The Irish Celts held three sacred assemblies every year at Tara§ during Bealtaine; Lughnasadh and Samhain which assured an abundance of corn and milk; freedom from conquest; the enjoyment of Righteous Laws; comfort in every house; fruit in great abundance, and plenty of fish in their lakes, rivers, and estuaries, exactly as God guaranteed Israel in The Torah/Tara, if they kept The Covenant. Also, during the Feast of Tara/Torah the kings of Ireland used to settle the affairs of Ireland for seven years, so that debts, suits and adjustments used not to be submitted for judgement until the next feast, seven years later, which the Torah calls the 'Year of the "I AM's" Release'** when all debts were forgiven, every seven years. This proves that Irish Celtic law was based on The Torah and is further confirmation that the Celts are Israelites.


** Deuteronomy 15:1 At the end of [every] seven years thou shalt make a release.
15:2 And this [is] the manner of the release: Every creditor that lendeth [ought] unto his neighbour shall release [it]; he shall not exact [it] of his neighbour, or of his brother; because it is called 
the "I AM"'s release.
§ Deuteronomy 16:16 Three times in a year shall all thy males appear before the "I AM" thy God in the place which He shall choose; in the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and in the Feast of Weeks, and in the Feast of Tabernacles: and they shall not appear before the "I AM" empty:
16:17 Every man [shall give] as he is able, according to 
the blessing of the "I AM" thy God which He hath given thee (corn; milk; fish; etc.; etc.; etc.).
16:18 Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates, which the "I AM" thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes: and they shall judge the people with 
just Judgment.
16:19 Thou shalt not pervert Judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous.
16:20 
That which is totally just shalt thou follow, that thou mayest live, and inherit the land which the "I AM" thy God giveth thee.
Also the word British is not English; it is Hebrew.
Brit (Berit) means Covenant in Hebrew and Welsh
Ish means man or people of, in Hebrew and English
Therefore British means The People of The Covenant,
in other words, the People Israel of The Covenant.

The Irish people have rejected the English (Davidic) monarchy and its ANTI-Covenant legislation and that is good; very good.

However, the Celtish / Irish people are Israelites descended from Jacob/Israel's fifth of his twelve sons, who was called Dan and fathered the Tuatha de Danaan - the Tribe of Dan (the Irish and Danish). Therefore the Irish people are Celtish / British-Israelites by birth i.e. People of The Covenant in the Torah in the Bible and in The Ark, which is buried at Tara.

Reject the House of Windsor's ANTI-Covenant and therefore unlawful legislation (Deuteronomy 4:2), by all means possible, but do not reject your birthright as Israelites and British people, with YOUR own emblem the War Queen of Ireland, with Trident and Olive Twig - Teia Tephi.
Tephi, symbolised by Britannia, the sixth century B.C. queen of all Ireland.

If you reject your Birth-Right as Israelitesyou are insulting God Who gave your Birthright to you, along with The Covenant.
Ireland is also called Hibernia - Hebernia from Heber/Eber the great grand-dad of Abraham who was the grand-dad of Jacob/Israel from whom the Celts are descended.

Hebernia (Ireland) means Hebrew's new land.
Heberia - Iberia (Spain) means Hebrew's land.
The Basque; Galician; Asturian and Guipuzcoan Celts are your cousins.

Copyright © 1999 JAH. All rights reserved.

 Celtic Flags
 
The Celtic / Saxon flags with their upright and diagonal crosses
are the flags of the ten "lost" tribes of Israel; of which the 
Unionof Jack|ob / Israel's flag is Christ's own personal flag, just
as the British Throne Jack|ob's Pillar / Bethel / the Lia Fail /
Stone of Destiny is shortly to become Christ's Throne.

 


 

This fact about Christ's flag is confirmed in Holy Scripture in Genesis 49:10 "The sceptre (sovereignty) shall not depart from Judah [to Joseph], nor a law-giver from between his feet, UNTIL Shiloh (Christ) comes [from Joseph-Ephraim v 22-24 & 48:16-19]; and unto him [shall] the gathering (Union) of the people (of Jackob / Israel) [be]."
Surely, to despise such a heritage as God and Christ's flag and protection is the greatest folly of all time. It is worse, for even if this generation cares nothing for it themselves, by what right do they take it from their children and their children's children?

It should be considered carefully that by this action 
Ireland, like CanadaSouth Africa and others (as some Australians are now proposing to do); has rejected Christ; insulted God and lost God's covering shield by which He marks and protects His own people.

That God does, at times, put a protective mark on His Own is definitely stated in the 9th chapter of Ezekiel. There we see that just before the destruction of ancient Jerusalem and its people by the 
Babylonians in 588 B.C., God sent an angel to put a mark on the forehead of all those including His Prophet Jeremiah (buried in Cairn T at Loughcrew, Co. Meath) and His Chosen Seed Teia Tephi (buried in a secret tomb in the Hill of Tara), who, despite the prevailing wickedness, had remained faithful to Him so that Tephi was brought to Ireland by Jeremiah and became the queen of Ireland, on the 21st of June in 583 B.C. The purpose of this mark was to ensure that they would not be harmed in the coming slaughter of the City's inhabitants. Thus the command to those in control of the attackers was "Smite . . . but come not near any upon whom is the mark."

This raises a most interesting question. What was this protective mark that the angel put on the foreheads of those who were to be saved from the coming destruction? The command, as it appears in our 
Bible is "Set a mark", but the literal translation is "Mark a mark". In the Hebrew usage of that day, this mark would be a "tau", the last letter of the alphabet and so, what in English is "Mark a mark" in Hebrew would be "Tau a tau".

In the original Hebrew alphabet this letter "
tau" appears as an upright cross + and, consequently, as the only possible way to "tau a tau", or "cross a cross", is to put one cross diagonally over the other, we see that the protective mark placed on the foreheads of those to be saved from the destruction of ancient Jerusalem must have been identical with the crossed cross of the Celtic / Israelite flags of Northern Spain, Britannia's Shield and Christ's flag the Union Jack.

It is also interesting with this in mind to observe what Christ said to the four angels who are to punish the inhabitants of the Earth in the Apocalypse / Revelation and see the similarity between then and the very near future:-


Apocalypse / Revelation 7:1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the Earth, holding the four winds of the Earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.
7:2 And I saw another angel ascending from the East, having the seal of the Living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea,
7:3 Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.


As this crossed cross was the mark or covering by which God protected His Own in that day, is it just a coincidence that under that same mark the 
British nation has remained unconquered and free for almost 3000 years? Even the Romans, with the military might of the whole known world at their command, were never able to establish themselves in Ireland and more than a part of what is now England, and even this they held by treaty and not by conquest. Caradoc (Caractacus) was betrayed not conquered.

With this in mind, let us now consider the statement made by the Lord as recorded in the Book of Revelation / Apocalypse where, in referring to Himself He says: "I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the First and the Last". The significance of this is that alpha and omega are the first and the last letters in the alphabet of the Greek language in which the New Covenant / Testament was written, and by using them as a name for Himself the Lord is emphasizing His identity with the One eternal and everlasting God, the First and the Last of all things.

In the Apocalypse / Revelation, chapters 17 and 18, Christ also warned His Own people to come out of the Babylonian Market-system and Church built on seven mountains that He has sworn to destroy, so His Own people shall not be partakers of her plagues and punishment.


Apocalypse / Revelation 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, 
COME OUT of her, MY people, that ye take not part in her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues (punishment). For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her inequities.

Yet the use of the first and the last letters of the alphabet to express the name of God is far older than the Lord's use of it in the Book of Revelation / Apocalypse. In the Old Covenant / Testament we often find God referring to Himself as "the First and the Last" and, from the time of 
Noah, and probably from the time of Enoch, this concept of God as the Eternal One was symbolised by a monogram formed of the first and the last letters of the ancient Hebrew alphabet.
These two letters are "aleph" and "tau", and in the original Hebrew alphabet aleph appears as a diagonal cross x and tau as an upright cross +. Thus, when combined as a symbol to express the idea of the Eternal God, they would appear like the protective mark referred to above, which is identical with the crossed cross of Britannia's shield (shown below); the flags of the Celtic / Israelites in Northern Spain and Christ's flag the Union Jack.
Picture of Britannia
(Britannia symbolises the ancient sixth century B.C.
"War Queen of Ireland" - 
queen Teia Tephi holding
the Olive from Jerusalem and the Trident she took from
Neptune's Porch [
Gibraltar] on her way to Ireland)
 
And so, in humble and reverent awe, perhaps you will come to the wondrous realisation that the Union Jack, in addition to being Christ's own personal flag and the protective mark which God places on His Own people, is actually the symbolic monogram or name of God Himself. Shielded by that name, a nation is safe from destruction under God's promise "No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper" (Isa. 54:17), whilst they serve Him. And it is this symbol of God's Name and Protection which IrelandCanada and South Africa have now discarded as their national emblem.
In thinking of this, we should never forget that twice within this century the Forces of Evil set out to conquer and enslave the world and that, despite tremendous military power, they failed primarily because the British Celto-Saxon Nations, united under the symbol of God's Name and in allegiance to His Throne, were able to act instantly and as one in opposing them. Obviously then, as they prepare for another and far greater attempt, we must expect that the Forces of Evil are doing everything in their power to see that that unity and symbol does not stand in their way again.
Could it be then that this is why these Israelite nations rejected Christ's flag, the Union Jack; that as they prepare for this great and final attempt to conquer the world, the Forces of Evil have been able to exert enough influence in IrelandCanada and South Africa to bring about the rejection of the symbol of that unity which has defended them so often in the past? And will the Throne; Jacob's Pillar - the Lia Fail / Stone of Destiny be next?
In any event, the enormous folly of this action is clearly evident in the ominous trend of world events. Today, as never before in all history, the world is filled with turmoil; trouble; strife; genocide; destruction of the environment with the climatic changes it has caused, and when these conditions are studied in the Light of Bible Prophecy, there can be no doubt that we are rapidly approaching that great and final struggle between the Forces of Good and of Evil, commonly called Armageddon.
The reality of this danger becomes even more evident when we recognise that the Celto-Saxon peoples are the continuation of God's servant race and nation Israel (the ten "lost" tribes), and that, consequently, it is both our duty and our destiny to defend the Right, and to act as His battle-axe and weapons of war in opposing the Forces of Evil (Jeremiah 51:20). This has been our inescapable role all through the ages and especially so in modern times when, twice within this century, the Forces of Evil failed to conquer the world because God used the nations of Celto-Saxondom to defeat them.
But what of the next time without God's Protection because the Celto-Saxon race has entered the "Time of Jacob's Trouble" and is going to be severely punished; by defeat and slavery to the Forces of Evil because you have never kept The Covenant that you made with God, under which He guaranteed your protection? Some even having rejected His flag. JAH
The symbol of the pre-Yesu Druidic faith was also the crossed-cross of Britannia's shield.
Now please read my "Celts are Israelites Under Another Name" and "Signs of The End Times" articles on this website. JAH.

No comments:

Post a Comment