Little Barack and his
DEAD donkey.
Once upon a time there
were two young boys named little Barack and Joe who bought a donkey from a
farmer for $100. The farmer agreed to deliver the donkey the next day.
When the farmer drove up the next day, he said, "Sorry guys, I have some
bad news. The donkey is on my truck, but I'm afraid he's dead."
They replied," Well then, just give our money back."
The farmer said, “I can't do that. I went and spent it already."
Little Barack said, "OK then, just unload the donkey anyway."
The farmer asked, "What are ya gonna do with him?"
Little Barack said, "I'm going to raffle him off."
The farmer exclaimed, "You can't raffle off a dead donkey!"
But little Barack, with a big smile on his face, said "Sure I can.
Watch me. I just won't tell anybody that he's dead."
A month later the farmer met up with little Barack and asked, "What
happened with that dead donkey?"
Little Barack said, "I raffled him off. I sold 500 tickets at two dollars apiece
and made a profit of $798.00."
Totally amazed, the farmer asked, "Didn't anyone complain that you had
stolen their money because you lied about the donkey being dead?"
Little Barack replied, "The only guy who found out about the donkey being
dead was the raffle winner, when he came to claim his prize. So I gave him his
$2 back plus $200 extra, which is double the going value of a donkey, so he
thought I was a really great guy"
Little Barack and his DEAD donkey.
What is a dead
donkey? Well, it is the same as a “dead wood”.
“Dead wood” is no
longer any good; it has no life substance and has been drained of its blood
called sap.
“Dead wood” now is
only good to be burnt to ashes and maybe keep someone warm in winter.
A dead donkey that
has been drained of its life substance (soul and blood) is of no use to any one
and needs to go through the fire and be burnt to ashes (to get rid of the
smell).
I would personally
bury it and make sure NO ONE WILL EVER DIG IT UP AGAIN.
This is not an Obama
bashing and I do not suggest we burn him.
Obama is only a
puppet on a string; he is no-body of importance.
The powerhouse is the BANKSTERS who are a gang of thieves who are
controlled by the ROTHSCHILDS who claim they are Jews.
Revelation2:9 I
know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know]
the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but [are]
(Idumeans) the synagogue of Satan.
3:9 Behold, I will make
them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are
NOT, but do LIE (Idumeans); behold, I will make them to come and worship before
thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
The dead donkey is all
thee useless laws man has created in the last 2500 years which cause all of us
to be SLAVES to their TAXES, interest rates
and devaluation of the mighty
dollar causing all of us to get poorer
and poorer.
ALL TAXES AND
INTEREST RATES and MONEY (CURRENCY) SHOULD BE ABOLISHED AND KILLED LIKE A
DONKEY WITH ALL THEIR USELESS LAWS AND ALL TO BE BURNT TO ASHES AND BURIED AND MAKE SURE NO ONE WILL DIG IT UP AGAIN AND
REINSTATE FATHER’S WORD, COMMANDMENTS, LAWS, STATUTES AND PRECEPTS so we can
LIVE and DO and BE all that our King requires.
By reading the
following webpage that have been submitted you can learn how to overthrow the EVIL
BANKSTERS AND ALL THEIR MATES, AND HAVE THEM ARRESTED AND PUT IN JAIL AND LOSE
THE KEY FOREVER.
THEY = Abbreviation for - The Hierarchy
Enslaving You.
From They Live!
Presidents Bush
and Obama, and the Faith Divide
In reflecting on
both President Obama’s speech in the aftermath of the Boston bombings and
President Bush’s speeches following the horrific attacks on Sept. 11, I have
come to understand better the different ways each man conveys their faith and
how this reflects on something going on in America today.
Both men speak
of God and the Bible and faith in many of their speeches and
conversations. And both men are
self-professed Christians, but for some reason many doubt the faith and
commitment of President Obama while never doubting the same of President Bush. Why is that?
I think much has
to do with how faith is reflected in their lives and practice. President Bush seems primarily religious in
outlook, while President Obama seems primarily spiritual. And because of this, President Bush sees the
world in more black-and-white terms, while President Obama sees the world as
more gray. President Bush conveyed more
bravado and an easier time coming to clear judgment, while President Obama
seems to weigh things in a more nuanced way and approach things more slowly.
This difference
of religious vs. spiritual between the two presidents represents a tension that
has emerged in the faith and political environment of America. On one side is a growing group of devout
religious folks who see traditional and definitive roles of family and faith as
under attack and in need of defending.
On the other side is a fast growing group of unaffiliated faith folks
who, while still believing in God or some universal presence, see tradition and
certain religions as holding back progress of society.
The religious
folks believe if you don’t have a black-and-white, right/wrong view of the
universe, then you hold no values and are untethered to principles. This group feels that the moral failures of
today’s society are a direct result of religious and family institutions having
been undermined, and that the lessening of adherence to strict faith practice
has caused our country to lose its way.
The spiritual
folks believe that traditional religious institutions have failed to keep pace
with a changing world and that the black-and-white view of the world has
increased the level of conflict and violence in our society – that it is the
judgmental ways of the religious folks that have prevented the progress needed
to move forward and evolve as a species.
This past
election played out in many ways with each side lining up behind who they
thought was the candidate who best represented their view of faith and the
world. Conservative religious folks
overwhelmingly supported the devote Mormon in the race, Mitt Romney, while the
spiritual folks favoured President Obama by huge margins.
This distinct
difference in faith adherence also reflects what consumer products folks
purchase and where folks live and the communities they put together to
live. Our country is becoming more and
more one of homogenous enclaves that highlight demographic differences as well
as faith distinctions.
Because of all
this, it is not surprising that the devout folks don’t see President Obama as a
“real Christian” even though he is a man who is highly spiritual and faithful. http://www.jahtruth.net/defin.htm
Attacks on him, even ones purely political,
have a religious, zealous feel to them.
And when we have seen that kind of attack in world history, it is very
hard to have an intellectual discussion and reach common understanding.
The perceptions
of President Bush by the unaffiliated group have a similar dynamic. Because he has a tendency to see things as
more black and white, there was an assumption he was “dumb” and didn’t give
thought to any of his policies. Attacks
on him became and are visceral and as mean-spirited as attacks on President
Obama.
In this polarized
political environment, the religious vs. spiritual underpinning of each side’s
argument has created a deep gulf that cannot be bridged by intellectual
arguments or “fact” presentations. As I
said before the election, we need some form of our own Middle East Peace
process that can bring opposing sides together to see the values that are
shared in common that aren’t about ritual and faith practice. The differences that exist in America today
are as stark as those involving Muslims and Jews and Christians in the Middle
East.
Each side
believes in the power of love. Each side
believes all human beings are created in the image of God. Each side believes we have an obligation to
respect nature and God’s creation. Each
side professes to the importance of the Golden Rule of do unto others as you
would have them do unto you. And
interestingly, each side sees the evil that greed and materialism can have on
society, though they want to blame different parties and solve it in different
ways.
The first step
in this peace process would be a coming together on shared core values and
respect for each side in their practice of faith. If we can start there, then maybe we can all
begin to move forward to build a world that we would be proud to leave our
children.
President Obama
and President Bush represent two distinct strains of American faith (one is religious
and the other spiritual) and both are good and decent men. Maybe after watching them come together in
Dallas recently for a day of respect, we can each take a step today and try to
accept someone who has a different faith view than us. It would be a good start.
Do you still think “THEY” are great guys and good
Christians?
No comments:
Post a Comment