Dr. David Martin
drops bombshell: The FDA has only approved a COVID-19 vaccine that does NOT
exist in the U.S. marketplace
Sunday, September
05, 2021 by: Nolan Barton
(Natural News) Dr. David Martin warned the public that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine that does not exist.
“When members of the mainstream suggest that this
approval has suddenly put what is sitting in freezers around the world into an
approved status, that’s actually not true,” Martin said during his
appearance on “Brighteon Conversations.”
“There are still manufacturing guidelines that were
not required for the EUA that would be required for a full-approved product.”
He told Health Ranger Mike Adams that the FDA has
approved a “unicorn.”
“Comirnaty does not exist,” Martin said,
referring to the brand name of the Pfizer vaccine granted full approval by the
federal agency. “The approval is for future production of COVID vaccine.”
(Related: FDA fraudulently grants full approval to Comirnaty covid vaccine,
skipping stage 3 trials and ignoring data on injuries and deaths.)
Martin related that some vital information had been
redacted in the approval letter that Pfizer had, as well as in its official
publication from the FDA.
“The section of where it can be manufactured and
when it can be manufactured is redacted, which is unusual given the fact that
an approval letter is supposed to be a public announcement that makes these
things visible,” Martin said.
COVID-19 vaccines
should lose EUA protections
Both Adams and Martin agreed that the confusion
brought by the approval was compounded by the extension of the emergency use
authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer vaccine used for children between the ages
12 and 15, as well as for the Moderna and the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19
vaccines.
“The mandate for EUA has to live inside of no
clinical alternative,” said Martin. “The moment there is an approval, then the
EUA protections for Moderna and Johnson & Johnson would cease to exist
instantaneously.”
In its approval letter, the FDA acknowledged that
there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine produced
under EUA still available for use. The FDA ruled that Pfizer’s
COVID-19 vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used
“interchangeably” with Comirnaty.
Under the circumstances,
it was clear that the granting of full approval was a calculated move by the
government to encourage businesses and schools to impose vaccine mandates and
enable Pfizer to unload inventories of its COVID-19 vaccine under EUA. Martin
said the Biden administration is pushing to get students vaccinated in time for
the start of the coming school year.
Difference
between fully approved and under EUA products
There is a huge real-world difference between
products approved under EUA compared with those fully approved by the FDA.
EUA products
are experimental under U.S. laws. Both the Nuremberg
Code and federal regulations state that no one can force a human
being to participate in the experiment. Under U.S. laws, it is unlawful to
deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental
subject. Potential recipients have an absolute right to
refuse experimental vaccines.
On the other hand, U.S. laws permit employers and
schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.
EUA-approved vaccines have an extraordinary
liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers,
distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability.
The only way an injured party can sue is if he or
she can prove willful misconduct and if the U.S. government has also brought an
enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit
has ever succeeded.
The Comirnaty vaccine is subject to the same
product liability laws as other U.S. products. Licensed adult vaccines,
including Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. People injured by the
Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages. Jury awards could be
astronomical, so Pfizer is unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty
vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for the product.
Public misled by
mainstream media
Members of the mainstream media were quick to
report that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers,
college students and employees in many industries following the full approval
given by the FDA to Comirnaty on Aug. 23.
The Pentagon promptly announced it will go ahead
with its plan to force members of the military to get vaccinated against the
virus, while New York City announced on the same day that all public school
teachers and other staffers will have to get vaccinated. (Related: Pentagon orders ALL members of the armed forces to be vaccinated,
essentially ordering thousands to die from blood clots and vascular damage.)
One of the first to implement the requirement was
the State University of New York (SUNY)
system, which has nearly 400,000 students and more than 85,000 faculty members
spread across its 64 campuses. Several other prominent institutions are
expected to impose vaccine mandates after consultation with their Boards of
Trustees and state officials.
Fauci started all
the madness decades ago
According to Martin, this madness all started in
1999. It was when National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Director Anthony Fauci came up with the idea of creating an infectious
replication-defective form of coronavirus. Fauci paid researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to invent a
pathogen that did not exist, Martin said.
Fauci
essentially asked the researchers to create a bioweapon. “You cannot
manufacture a bioweapon and not say that you’re trying to kill people. That’s
what a bioweapon is for,” Martin said.
Kizzy
Corbett, the person behind the development of COVID-19 vaccines using mRNA
technology, once said: “It’s really cool because you don’t even need much of
lab. You can build one of these on your computer at home.”
That, Martin
said, is an admission of biological warfare.
“We are not talking about a virus. We are talking
about an engineered pathogen,” Martin said. “We are not talking about a
vaccine. We are talking about the introduction of a computer-simulated code in
the form of mRNA – not to stimulate your immune system, but to turn your body into
a factory producing S1 spike proteins similar to those found in coronavirus.”
Watch the full episode of “Brighteon
Conversations” with Mike Adams and Dr. David Martin here:
https://www.brighteon.com/309412a4-65e5-4bd6-a7c9-52805b5a6b93
Follow Immunization.news for more news and
information related to coronavirus vaccines.
Sources include:
No comments:
Post a Comment