The Nature of Money: Greater Fools & FRNs
Mrs. Jester (the better half)
Image by Will Montague via Flickr
In 1998, everyone knew that the stock market was hugely
overvalued. Nevertheless, people continued to purchase more stocks. These purchases were justified in part by the
theory of “greater fools”.
Under the greater fool theory, I can afford to foolishly
pay $100 for a stock that’s only worth $50, so long as I can find an even
“greater fool” who’ll pay me $150 for the same $50 stock. My “greater fool” can safely pay me $150 (for
the $50 stock) so long as he can find an even greater fool who’ll pay him $200,
etc.
So long as we don’t run out of greater and greater fools,
Ponzi economics can flourish indefinitely and all of the fools can seemingly
get rich. But when the bull market of
the late 1990s exhausted its supply of fools, the market fell 20%.
In hindsight, that’s all fairly obvious. But, whether we
know it or not, all of us still play the “greater fool” game—even if we’re not
speculating in stocks.
For proof, look in your wallet. Find any FRNs (Federal Reserve Notes)? If
so, your prosperity also depends on the supply and confidence of “greater
fools”.
• Last week (in “The Nature of Money: All Rights Flow
from Title”) I explained that understanding the difference between legal title
(right of ownership and control) and equitable title (right of possession and
use) was vital to understanding our “money”.
To illustrate the issue of title, consider your car. Do
you own it?
Even if you have a “Certificate of Title,” the answer is
No. You have equitable title to your car, but the state has legal title and
therefore owns and can control the vehicle.
Because the state owns legal title to “your” car, it can force you to
license, register and insure the vehicle.
If you had legal title, the state could not subject you to those
requirements. However, since you’re only
entitled to possess and use the car, if you fail to meet the state-owner’s
rules, you can be ticketed, jailed, or even compelled to forfeit the “state’s”
vehicle.
How do you gain legal title to something? Primarily by paying for it with lawful money
(gold & silver); by paying with a “medium of exchange” (exchange of legal
titles) rather than a “medium of transfer” (transfer of equitable titles).
Most people would be astonished to understand that it’s
legally impossible to repay your loans with modern debt-based currency like
FRNs. The reason is simple: You can’t “pay” a debt with another debt.
Given that our FRNs are all loaned into existence,
they’re all “debt-based” (promises to pay) and can’t truly “pay” for
anything. As a result, we can’t own (buy
legal title to) any property purchased with FRNs.
Sound crazy?
It is. Our monetary system is a kind of
Alice-in-Wonderland, economic madness with Ben Bernanke starring as the “Mad
Hatter”.
Will you pay—or merely promise to pay?
FRNs are like IOUs. Suppose I want to sell ten acres of
Texas ranchland for $100,000. Suppose no one wants to buy my land, except my
friend Rick who not only lacks gold or silver to buy, but doesn’t even have
enough FRNs to purchase my land. But if I’m a “motivated seller,” I might agree
to accept Rick’s $100,000 IOU (promise to pay) for the land.
Anyone who knows Rick understands that: 1) the
probability that he’ll ever actually repay that $100,000 IOU is zero; and 2) I
was a fool to accept Rick’s $100,000 IOU in trade for my land.
Even so, fool that I am, all is not lost. If I can find
an even greater fool to accept Rick’s IOU in trade for something I want, I can
prosper.
Suppose I found a cabin on five acres in Minnesota that
the owner was willing to trade for Rick’s IOU.
I would’ve found my “greater fool” and prospered.
The Minnesota fool would take Rick’s worthless IOU so
long as he had confidence that he, too, could find an even “greater fool” to
take the IOU in return for something the Minnesota fool wanted—say, $100,000
worth of Hawaiian pineapples. The
process works just fine so long as everyone can find a greater fool willing to
accept Rick’s worthless IOU.
• However, there
are some problems.
First, Rick never actually paid for my ten acres of
ranchland. All he did was “promise to pay” (create a debt) by writing “IOU
$100,000” on a scrap of brown grocery bag paper and sign his name. His total
“cost” for purchasing my ten acres was a scrap of paper, some ink, and whatever
effort it required to write a few words. In essence, he “purchased” my land for
nothing.
If you think that’s bad, just wait until Rick realizes he
can write even more IOUs to other fools. Pretty soon, Rick will have a new
Ferrari, a mansion, a bevy of big-chested blonds, and may even run for the
Senate. So long as he doesn’t run out of ink and grocery bag paper, Rick could
purchase the whole state despite the fact that he’s never done an honest day’s
work.
Obviously, there’s something fundamentally unjust about
empowering anyone (be it my friend Rick or Ben Bernanke) to purchase real
property with pieces of worthless paper (be they IOUs or FRNs). While everyone else has to work to create
assets to trade for their food, shelter and property, the person who prints the
paper currency (debt instruments) need do nothing but occasionally sign his name.
Should we be surprised if a person entitled to pass mere promises to pay
(debts) rather than actual payments (physical gold and silver ) eventually
comes to “own” the whole earth?
• Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 of The Constitution of
the United States declares in part that States shall not “make any Thing but
gold or silver Coin Tender in Payment of Debts.” But a “tender” is not a “legal
tender”. A “tender” is an offer to pay a debt that a creditor may freely choose
to accept or reject. However, a “legal tender” is an offer to “discharge” a
debt with a worthless debt instrument which—though acknowledged to be
worthless—cannot be refused. If you’ve
offered to sell your car, house or land—you are required by law to accept
perfectly worthless FRNs (“legal tender”) as “payment” for your property.
For example, I can “tender” (offer) Rick’s intrinsically
worthless $100,000 IOU to purchase a Minnesota cabin; the Minnesota “owner” is
free accept or reject my offer. But if Rick could persuade Congress to pass a
law that declared “Rick’s Reserve Notes” to be “legal tender,” then, when I
“tendered” Rick’s IOU for the Minnesota cabin, the previous homeowner would be
effectively forced to accept that “legal tender” of intrinsically worthless
paper in trade for possession of his valuable house. His only hope in taking my worthless “legal
tender” would be that he might find (or even create) some other, “greater fool”
who would again accept the “legal tender”.
Of course, Congress passed no such laws on Rick’s behalf,
but Congress did pass such laws to favor the Federal Reserve System and cause
FRNs (which are just as intrinsically worthless as Rick’s IOU) to be accepted
as a legal tender—but not a “payment”—for any debt.
Government-granted privileges
The federal government granted the Federal Reserve System
a very special privilege: in violation of the Constitution, Congress legislated
FRNs to be “legal tender”. Although the FRN has no more intrinsic value than
Rick’s IOU, thanks to the “legal tender” law, we theoretically shouldn’t have
to worry about finding a “greater fool” when we accept a worthless FRN.
With FRNs we needn’t worry that some smart guy might
refuse to accept our worthless pieces of paper. Because each FRN carries the
legal notice “THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE,” even
the guys who understand that FRNs are worthless must nevertheless accept
them—whether they want ’em or not.
By passing “legal tender” laws, our government has forced
Americans to accept the status of “greater fool”—i.e., we are required by law
accept worthless pieces of paper in return for our labor and tangible property.
And if you think you’re not a “greater fool” than the guy you got the FRN from,
consider that, thanks to inflation, a FRN worth $1 in 1933 is worth less than a
nickel, today. Since A.D. 2000, the FRN’s purchasing power has fallen by at
least 40%. Every FRN you’ve ever
received is worth less today than the day you accepted it. FRNs are constantly “leaking” value. If you’re saving your wealth in the form of
FRNs, you’re a fool.
The “greater fool” legal tender system is a Ponzi scheme.
More, since each successive fool must be an increasingly “greater” fool, the
magnitude of the economic foolishness eventually rises to a point where even public
school graduates recognize the madness, refuse to play and start buying gold
and silver. Once we run out of “greater” fools (as we inevitably must and are
beginning to do), the system must collapse.
• Why
collapse? In large measure because a
debt can’t be paid by another debt (a “promise to pay”)—it can only be paid by
the exchange of substance for substance, like for like, legal title for legal
title.
As debt-instruments, FRNs can be used to transfer use
(equitable title) of property from one person to another, but they can’t
convey/exchange that property’s legal title between the immediate buyer and
seller.
As a result, we are deemed to merely possess (but not
actually own) whatever we’ve “purchased” (not bought) with FRNs, checks, or
credit cards. Our debt-based currency thereby makes us poor and reduces us to
the status of eternal sharecroppers who are foolishly working to possess that
which we cannot truly own.
Americans like to hear the mantra that “America is the
richest country on earth.” But the truth
is that the total American debt (governmental and private) is estimated to be
at least $75 trillion. We appear to be
wealthy because we’ve used our MasterCard to pay off our Visa to pay off our
American Express. But the truth is
that we are the biggest debtor-nation in the world. By that standard, we are not the richest
nation. We are arguably the poorest. The
Emperor is buck nekkid.
America’s illusion of wealth has been maintained in part
by exporting trillions of FRNs (debt instruments) that Americans might not take
to foreign countries and investors. But
these foreign “fools” are running out of “greater (foreign) fools”. Because they’re no longer able to dump their
FRNs on the international market without offering significant discounts, the
foreign FRN-holding fools are coming back to the USA to buy our businesses,
stocks and natural resources. And
they’ll be able to trade all of their worthless FRNs for tangible American
resources because our “legal tender” laws force Americans to be the “greater
fools of last resort” and accept those worthless FRNs in trade for our
resources. As we’re finally forced by
law to trade our resources for worthless FRNs, we may finally discover that we
are not the world’s richest country, but one of the poorest.
Quantity vs. Quality
If your “money” is debt-based FRNs, it constitutes a loan
and legal title to the FRNs remain with the lender. Therefore legal title to whatever you think
you’re “buying” actually belongs to the entity that loaned the debt-based FRNs
into circulation (the Federal Reserve System). You only “purchase” equitable
title to property with FRNs.
As a result, though it seems unbelievable, the quality of
your “money” is more important than the quantity. You can buy more (legal title) with one
dollar’s worth of lawful money than you can with a million “dollars” worth of
legal tender (which can only get you equitable title).
Since there’s virtually no lawful money (gold/silver) in
circulation, you can’t acquire legal title to property you purchase. As a result, government (acting in concert
with the Federal Reserve System) can fine you for failing to mow “your” lawn
or jail you for driving “your” car without insurance.
Why? Because they’re not really “your” lawn or “your”
car—they’re the Federal Reserve’s and/or the federal government’s. You merely get to “use” those properties much
like sharecroppers are entitled to “use” (but not own) farm property owned by
their “masters”. Thanks to FRNs and
legal tender laws, the state/Federal Reserve System “owns” legal title to
virtually all the property you believe is “yours”.
Without legal title, you have no legal rights to that
property, you have no standing at law or access to courts of law (which are
intended to determine legal rights). You have only equitable rights and access
to courts of equity wherein the judge rules according to his own “conscience”
and can slap you around however he likes (judicial activism; judge-made law).
All of these disabilities flow from the quality of your “money” rather than the
quantity.
In the 1990s, a number of individuals (particularly in
Oregon) bought automobiles and secured bills of sale that expressly reflected
the fact that the automobiles were paid for, in part, with genuine, pre-1964
silver dimes (lawful money). When
traffic cops tried to ticket to these drivers, the drivers went to court,
produced the bills of sale and the judges dismissed the tickets.
Why? Because the
buyers had paid (at least in part) for their cars with lawful money and
therefore had some claim to the legal title of the automobile. The state didn’t clearly own legal title to
the automobile and therefore couldn’t regulate its use by issuing traffic
tickets.
Today, the government’s defenses against using a stack of
silver dimes to buy legal title have become more sophisticated. It’s harder to make an effective claim of
legal title to your property, but if you’re very knowledgeable, it can still be
done.
My point is that even if you offer $1 million in FRNs,
you won’t usually get legal title to a new car.
But if your payment includes over 20 silver dollars, you might be able
to get legal title.
The quality of your money is ultimately more important
than the quantity.
• Remember the old
saying about “A fool and his money”? Today, thanks to the legal tender laws,
that saying might be updated to, “A fool and his law (or perhaps a fool and his
legal rights) are soon parted.”
Are we fools? Yes. We are “statutory fools”—fools-in-law.
Why?
Because our government betrayed our trust and passed
legal tender laws which force us to be the “greater fools” who merrily accept
worthless paper as if it were lawful money. By playing the fool, we’ve lost
most of our legal rights and our access to courts of law. Like Esau, we’ve
traded our inheritance for bowls of pottage.
If you would regain your inheritance and your liberty,
stop playing the fool—compel your government to restore a constitutional money.
Written at arm’s length and without the singular “United
States” (“this state”) by Alfred Adask
No comments:
Post a Comment