The Birth of Jesus the Nazarite at Passover in 7 B.C..

The Birth of Jesus the Nazarite at Passover in 7 B.C..

In the year 7 B.C. there was a conjunction of Jupiter (the king of the planets) and Saturn (thought to be the protector of Israel) in the Constellation of Pisces (the Sign of the Messiah), as computed by Johannes Kepler, that was first visible at daybreak on the 12th of April. (Passover in 7 B.C. was on Monday April 13th which commenced at sundown on the 12th.)
 

King; Israel; Messiah. 12th April 7 B.C.

On the morning of the 29th of May it is believed the stars were visible for 2 hours and, on December 4th  of 7 B.C. Jupiter and Saturn met in the Constellation of Pisces for the last time.

The A.D. system of dating is inaccurate: It is a system of dating which owes little to the birth of Christ and rather more to the imagination of a Scythian monk Dionysius Exiguus who was instructed in A.D. 533 to commence a new calendar working backwards from his day to the birth of Christ. As is to be expected, he was years adrift in his reckoning. We know roughly when Jesus was born from the New Testament narrative:

Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea, in the days of Herod the king.  Matthew 2:1

It is a fact of history that Herod died in 4 B.C.

Between the birth of Jesus and the death of Herod there were several events which necessitate there being a period of years separating the two events. There was the 'slaughter of the innocents' which drove the Jesus family into Egypt. Herod dare not have mounted that until the census ordered by Caesar had been completed and such a census could not be completed in a few months. People had to travel far and wide to census points and the whole operation, including the necessary checks which would be undertaken, would take a long time. Thus the Bible narrative indicates that the birth of Jesus could not have been very much later than 7 B.C.

Also Herod had all of the children of two years of age and under murdered and he died in 4 B.C. so that means that the birth of Jesus was at least two years prior to Herod's death, i.e. 7-6 B.C.
 

Matthew 2:1 Now when Jesus had been born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men (druids) to the East to Jerusalem,
2:2 Saying, Where is he that has been BORN King of the Jews? for we saw his "Star" in the East, and are come to worship him.
2:3 When Herod the king had heard [these things], he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him.
2:4 And when he had gathered all the chief priests and lawyers of the people together, he demanded of them where Christ should be born.
2:5 And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea: for thus it is written by the prophet,
2:6 And thou Bethlehem, [in] the land of Judah, art not the least among the princes of Judah: for out of thee shall come a Governor (of this prison planet), that shall rule My people Israel.
2:7 Then Herod, when he had privily called the wise men, enquired of them diligently [exactly] what time the "Star" had appeared.
2:8 And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search diligently for the young child; and when ye have found [him], bring me word again, that I may come and worship him also.
2:9 When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo, the "Star", which they had seen in the East, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was.
2:10 When they saw the "Star", they rejoiced with exceeding great joy.
2:11 And when they were come into the HOUSE, they saw the young CHILD with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.
2:12 And being warned of God in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country another way.
2:13 And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I bring thee word: for Herod will seek the young child (not baby) to destroy him.
2:14 When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, and departed into Egypt:
2:15 And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called My son.
2:16 Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked by the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from TWO YEARS old and under, according to the time which he had diligently [and accurately] enquired of the wise men.
2:17 Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremiah the Prophet, saying,
2:18 In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping [for] her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not.
2:19 But when Herod was dead, behold, an angel of the Lord appeareth in a dream to Joseph in Egypt,

To the wise men (Druids*) who studied astronomy and astrology this was a sign so powerful that they could not ignore it. Jupiter the 'Kingly star' and Saturn the 'Protector of Israel' in the constellation of the 'Sign of the Messiah'. Being Israelites and Levites in exile they would know from the Book of Micah in Holy Scripture that the place of the birth of the foretold Messiah-King would be Bethlehem, but because it took them two years before they could get to Judaea, from the British Isles, they would automatically seek for their King in the capital city of Jerusalem.
At 05.24 am, 12/4/7 BC. - Jupiter and Saturn in the Constellation of Pisces.
 

At 07.27 am, 12/4/7 BC. - Mercury; Venus and the Sun joined the conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in the Constellation of Pisces, making it even more potent in its message. The King (Jupiter) Protector of Israel (Saturn), the Messiah (Pisces), the Messenger (Mercury) from Venus (Rev. 22:16 / Kk 30:16) and the Sun of Righteousness (Malachi 4:2).

After finding out from Herod that the Messiah-King was not in Jerusalem the Druids went to Bethlehem and there found the young child Jesus in his parents' house.

When the shepherds who were watching their flocks in the fields of Bethlehem, came to see Jesus during the night on which he was born, the word used in the account (Luke, chapter 2) defining Jesus is (brephos) a new-born babe, but when the Wise Men (Druids) from the West visited, he is then described as (paidion) a little lad or little child.
 

The Shepherds
In Luke 2: 8 we read, And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field keeping watch over their flocks by night. There is a saying of the Talmudists that the flocks were taken to the fields in March and brought back in November. This of course could only apply to the higher mountainous parts of Palestine. In many of the lower parts of the country the flocks were able to be in the fields all the year round. The little town of Bethlehem itself is situated about 2,550 feet above sea-level (an altitude much higher than that of any town in the whole of Great Britain), but some of the country round Bethlehem is considerably higher still. Whilst in Jericho, which is one of the lowest towns in the world and less than 30 miles away, the climate is almost tropical, yet up in Bethlehem there is usually frost and quite often snow in the Winter. One can realise therefore that the Bethlehem area was one of those districts where the sheep were brought in during the Winter, and if this be correct, then according to the time of the movement of the sheep stated by the Talmudists, Jesus would not be born in the Winter but sometime between March and November when the sheep were out in the fields at night.
From this information it can be concluded that the birth of Jesus was probably on, April 12th  in 7 B.C. at Passover.
Some people believe the birth was in September, but whichever month it was, it was in 7 B.C. not the year zero or 1 A.D..

http://jahtruth.net/celtisr.htm

The Death of Jesus the Nazarite at Passover in 34 AD

Three days and nights

Jonah 1:17 (KJV)  

Now the Lord had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.

Matthew 12:40 (KJV)  

For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

Matthew 27:63 (KJV)  

Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, after three days I will rise again.

Mark 8:31 (KJV)  

And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.

Mark 9:31 (KJV)  

For he taught his disciples, and said unto them, The Son of man is delivered into the hands of men, and they shall kill him; and after that he is killed, he shall rise the third day.

John 2:18-21 (KJV)  

Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? 19Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. 20Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? 21But he spake of the temple of his body.

Yahshua cried out at 3:00 P.M. Then He died just after that

Matthew 27:46-50 (KJV)  

And about the ninth hour (3.00 in the afternoon) Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? 47Some of them that stood there, when they heard that, said, This man calleth for Elias. 48And straightway one of them ran, and took a spunge, and filled it with vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave him to drink. 49The rest said, Let be, let us see whether Elias will come to save him.

50Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.

Mark 15:34-37 (KJV)  

And at the ninth hour (3.00 in the afternoon) Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? which is, being interpreted, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? 35And some of them that stood by, when they heard it, said, Behold, he calleth Elias. 36And one ran and filled a spunge full of vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave him to drink, saying, Let alone; let us see whether Elias will come to take him down. 37And Jesus cried with a loud voice, and gave up the ghost.

Luke 23:44-46 (KJV)  

And it was about the sixth hour, and there was a darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour. 45And the sun was darkened, and the veil of the temple was rent in the midst.

46And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost.

Yahshua died and was placed in the grave on the preparation day before the feast

Matthew 27:62 (KJV)  

Now the next day THURSDAY, that followed the day of the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate,

Mark 15:42

And now when the even was come, because it was the preparation, that is, the day before the Passover High Holy Day Sabbath.

Luke 23:54 (KJV)  

And that day was the preparation, and the Sabbath was drawing near THURSDAY.

John 19:31

Now because it was the preparation day and since the Jews did not want to have the bodies left on the stake during the Sabbath day THURSDAY, (for that Sabbath day was a high feast day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.

Passover sacrificed before the feast

Leviticus 23:5-8

In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is “I AM” Passover sacrifice to be killed. 6And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto “I AM”: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread. 7In the first day ye shall have an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein. 8But ye shall offer an offering made by fire unto “I AM” seven days: in the seventh day is an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein.

1 Cor. 5:7 (KJV)  

Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For truly Yahshua our Passover is sacrificed for us:

Yahshua was put in the grave before sunset

Luke 23:50-54 (KJV)  

And, behold, there was a man named Joseph, a counsellor; and he was a good man, and a just: 51(The same had not consented to the counsel and deed of them;) he was of Arimathaea, a city of the Jews: who also himself waited for the kingdom of God. 52This man went unto Pilate, and begged the body of Yahshua. 53And he took it down, and wrapped it in linen, and laid it in a sepulchre that was hewn in stone, wherein never man before was laid. 54And that day was the preparation, and the Sabbath was drawing near THURSDAY .

John 19:31 (KJV)  

The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high feast day THURSDAY,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.

The Passover service

Exodus 12:5-6 (KJV)  

Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the first year: ye shall take it out from the sheep, or from the goats: 6And ye shall keep it up until the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it in the evening.

Exodus 12:18 (KJV)  

In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month at even, ye shall eat unleavened bread, until the one and twentieth day of the month at even.

Numbers 28:16-17 (KJV)  

And in the fourteenth day of the first month is the Passover of “I AM”. 17And in the fifteenth day of this month is the feast: seven days shall unleavened bread be eaten.

Yahshua our Passover

1 Cor. 5:7 (KJV)  

Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us:

Hebrews 9:22 (KJV)  

And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.

Hebrews 9:28 (KJV)  

So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.

Hebrews 9:13-15

For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh: 14How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God? 15And for this cause he is the mediator of the renewed covenant, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

1 Peter 1:19 (KJV)  

But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:

Yahweh’s Sabbaths

A sign or mark-the ability to hear Father and Christ written on your forehead that proves that you truly belong to Yahweh.

Exodus 31:13-17 (KJV)  

Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying, verily my Sabbaths ye shall keep: for it is a sign (My mark-the ability to hear Father and christ) between me and you throughout your generations; that ye may know that I am “I AM” that doth sanctify you. 14Ye shall keep the Sabbath therefore; for it is holy unto you: every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death: for whosoever doeth any work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people. 15Six days may work be done; but in the seventh is the Sabbath of rest, holy to “I AM”: whosoever doeth any work in the Sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death. 16Wherefore the children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations, for a perpetual covenant. 17It is a sign (My mark-the ability to hear Father and christ) between me and the children of Israel for ever: for in six days “I AM” made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed.

Leviticus 23:24 (KJV)  

Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, In the seventh month, in the first day of the month, shall ye have a Sabbath, a memorial of blowing of trumpets, an holy convocation.

Leviticus 23:32 (KJV)  

It shall be unto you a Sabbath of rest, and ye shall afflict your souls: in the ninth day of the month at even, from even unto even, shall ye celebrate your Sabbath.

Leviticus 23:39 (KJV)  

Also in the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when ye have gathered in the fruit of the land, ye shall keep a feast unto “I AM”  seven days: on the first day shall be a Sabbath, and on the eighth day shall be a Sabbath.

Deut. 5:12-15 (KJV)  

Keep the Sabbath day to sanctify it, as “I AM”  thy God hath commanded thee. 13Six days thou shalt labour, and do all thy work: 14But the seventh day is the Sabbath of “I AM”  thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, nor thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thine ox, nor thine ass, nor any of thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates; that thy manservant and thy maidservant may rest as well as thou. 15And remember that thou wast a servant in the land of Egypt, and that “I AM”  thy God brought thee out thence through a mighty hand and by a stretched out arm: therefore “I AM”  thy God commanded thee to keep the Sabbath day.

Deut. 6:1-2 (KJV)  

Now these are the commandments, the statutes, and the judgments, which “I AM”  your God commanded to teach you, that ye might do them in the land whither ye go to possess it: 2That thou mightest fear “I AM” thy God, to keep all his statutes and his commandments, which I command thee, thou, and thy son, and thy son's son, all the days of thy life; and that thy days may be prolonged.

Deut. 6:24-25 (KJV)  

And the Lord commanded us to do all these statutes, to fear “I AM” our God, for our good always, that he might preserve us alive, as it is at this day. And it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before “I AM”  our God, as he hath commanded us.

If Yahshua tells the truth and never changes his mind, How come all the Gentiles Churches worship on a Sunday. It’s easy. They all disobey Yahweh laws and commands, therefore they all need to repent and keep the Sabbath on Saturday so that Yahweh can put His Mark or Sign on your forehead.

When was Yahshua placed in the Grave

Wednesday Afternoon before Sunset.

For Three Days and Three Nights

Wednesday afternoon      one day

Thursday night, 6pm         one night

Thursday day                       second day

Friday night, 6pm                  second night

Friday day                       third day

Saturday night, 6pm         third night

As you can see Yahshua rose from the dead about sunrise on

Saturday the Sabbath. which is about a full 12 hours before Sunday night

Yahshua was born 12.04.07BC and He died on Wednesday before sunset 21.04.34AD and rose from the dead on Saturday24.04.34AD WELL before SUNRISE just 12 HOURS before the next day called Sunday

VATICAN CONFIRMATION that JOSEPH of ARIMATHAEA (the VIRGIN's uncle) went to ENGLAND and continued the Conversion of the BRITISH. (It had already been STARTED by Jesus - Himself).

 Joseph de Marmore (Marmorica in Egypt) from Arimathaea, was (according to a manuscript at Jesus College Oxford) brother to Bianca and Ann (V. Mary's mother); uncle to Virgin Mary and great-uncle to Jesus, whose body he claimed from Pontius Pilate, as, by law, only a relative could.

The Catholic priest Polydore Vergil who was born in Italy in 1470; studied at Bologna and Padua; was so renowned for his literary talents that catholic Henry 7th (NOT the Protestant 8th) asked him to write an English History. As an Italian and a Catholic proxy Bishop; Prebendary and Archdeacon who became Chamberlain to Pope Alexander VII, he had no axe to grind on behalf of Britain or the British Church. It would no doubt have suited him much better if he could have written of Rome as being the first Christian church but he could not and did not. He wrote:-
"Britain, partly through Joseph of Arimathaea, partly through Fugatus and Damianus, was of all kingdoms FIRST TO RECEIVE THE GOSPEL." (Even before Palestine).

The antiquity of the British church had been challenged by the ambassadors of Spain and France before the Roman Catholic Council of Pisa (A.D. 1417). The British (catholic) delegates Robert Hallam, Bishop of Salisbury, Henry Chichele, a former Archbishop of Canterbury and Thomas Chillendon, won the day, the council affirmed that the British church (not the Church of England and not catholic because it was pre-catholic) was the first Christian church (community).

The ambassadors appealed to the Roman Catholic Council of Constance, also in A.D. 1417, and that council confirmed the findings of the Council of Pisa.

A third decision by the Roman Catholic Council at Sienna 1424 again confirmed the antiquity of the British church and, finally at the Council at Basle in 1434 it was laid down that the churches of Spain and France had to accept the precedence of the British Church, which it was affirmed, was founded by Joseph of Arimathaea (Mary's uncle) "immediately after the passion of Christ."

The VATICAN MANUSCRIPT quoted by Baronius in his "Ecclesiastical Annals A.D. 35", (the same year in which the Acts of the Apostles state that all, except the Apostles, were scattered abroad from Judaea) records that in this year Lazarus, Maria Magdalene, Martha, her handmaiden Marcella, Maximin a disciple, Joseph the Decurion (Roman Minister for Mines) of Arimathaea, against all of whom the Jewish people had special reasons for hatred, were exposed to the sea in a vessel without sails or oars. The vessel drifted finally to Marseilles, and they were saved. From Marseilles Joseph and his company passed into Britain, and after preaching the Gospel there, died (and was buried). Other sources report that there were a total of 14 people in the vessel.


John had been made guardian of Virgin Mary, by Jesus, from the cross, but John became a fugitive and so passed the guardianship over to Mary's uncle Joseph of Arimathaea who, being the Roman Minister of Mines (and having become rich by trading with mines in Britain for years), was the least vulnerable and Mary could therefore not be any safer than she was with him.

The fact that Mary was NOT with John is proved by his second letter which was written to her saying that he hoped to be able to visit her; but he became exiled on the Island of Patmos, where Christ gave him the Book of Revelation/Apocalypse, so Mary went with Joseph of Arimathaea to England (where they are BOTH buried, as USED to be taught by the early Catholic Church). Britain was the ONLY place they COULD go to, that was SAFE from Roman Persecution, because the Romans had already conquered and subjugated everywhere, except for Britain.

2 John (John's Second Letter - in The Holy Bible - New Covenant/Testament)
1:1 The "Elder" unto the elect lady (Mary) and her CHILDREN (Matt. 13:55-56), whom I love in the truth; and not I only, but also all they that have known the Truth (Heb. Nazir - Jesus Nazir);
1:3 Grace be with you, mercy, [and] peace, from God the Father, and from the Lord Jesus+Christ, (Christ the spirit-Being) the Son of the Father (not the son of Mary), in truth and love.
1:12 Having many things to write unto you, I would not [write] with paper and ink: but I trust to come unto you, and speak face to face, that our joy may be full.

Jesus grew up safely in England (the city of Nazareth did not exist until the fourth century A.D.) and started his ministry in England with the "Lost sheep of the House of Israel" (10 lost tribes) before going to Palestine. That is why there is no mention in the Gospels of his being in Israel except for on one occasion at age twelve when he visited The Temple, as was the custom.

God tells us, through the Prophet Daniel*, that the Messiah will confirm The Covenant for one week (7 days - 7 years in Prophecy) and we know that his ministry in Palestine was not one week nor seven years in duration. The British people (the "House of Israel") in England were already accepting Jesus as the promised Messiah and were being converted by Him in the beginning of that "week", before He left to fulfill His mission and complete the "week" in Palestine, hence:-

Matthew 21:43 Therefore say I unto you (the Jews), The Kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a NATION (NOT a church) bringing forth (already) the fruits thereof (the "10 lost tribes" - the "House of Israel", in Britain).
Matthew 10:5 These TWELVE (including PETER - 10:2) Jesus sent forth, and COMMANDED them, saying, Go NOT into the way of the Gentiles (ROME, etc.), and into [any] city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
10:6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the "House of Israel" (NOT the "House of Jewdah").

* Daniel 9:27 "And he shall CONFIRM The Covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week (WEDNESDAY NOT Friday) he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations He shall make [it] desolate, even until the consummation (the "Lake of Hell-Fire"), and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate."

Matthew 21:42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the Scriptures, The "Stone" which the builders* REJECTED, the same is become the Head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? (Psalm 2)
21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The Kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof (the "10 lost tribes"- the "House of Israel").
21:44 And whosoever shall fall on this "Stone" shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it (the "Stone") will grind him to powder. (Daniel 2:34-35)
21:45 And when the *chief priests and politicians had heard his parables, they perceived that he spoke about them.
21:46 But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a Prophet. - JAH 

The GOSPEL TRUTH about Virgin Mary (Yahshua’s own APOSTLES)

  Paul's letter to the Galatians
1:19 But other of the apostles saw I none, except James the Yahshua’s (half) BROTHER (Read the Gospel according to James - his beautiful letter to YOU).
1:20 Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I LIE NOT.

The Gospel of Matthew
10:2 Now the names of the twelve apostles are these; The first, Simon, who is called Peter (Cephas), and Andrew his brother; James [the son] of Zebedee, and John his brother;
10:3 Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the taxman; James (the Lord's half-brother - ch. 13:55 below and Gal. 1:19 above) [the son] of Alphaeus (Mary's second husband) and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus;
10:4 Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him.

13:55 Is not this (Jesus) the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his BROTHERS, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Jude? (4 of them).
13:56 And his SISTERS (more than one sister), are they not all with us? Whence then hath this [man] all these things? (Mary therefore, including Jesus, gave birth to an absolute minimum of SEVEN children - count them for yourself) (How could she possibly have been a PERPETUAL virgin?)
13:57 And they were offended in him. But Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house.
13:58 And he did not many mighty works there because of their unbelief.

The Gospel of Mark
3:18 And Andrew, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas, and James (the Lord's half-brother - ch. 6:3 below) the [son] of Alphaeus (Mary's second husband), and Thaddaeus, and Simon the Canaanite,
3:19 And Judas Iscariot, which also betrayed him: and they went into an house.

6:3 Is not this the carpenter, (Jesus) the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Jude, and Simon (FIVE brothers including Jesus)? and are not his sisterS (at LEAST TWO) here with us? And they were offended at him.
6:4 But Jesus said unto them, A Prophet is not without honour, except in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house.
6:5 And he could there do no mighty work, save that he laid his hands upon a few sick folk, and healed [them].
6:6 And he marvelled because of their unbelief. And he went round about the villages, teaching. 

Why does the pope teach his followers (catholics) that Jesus's own chosen apostles and the Bible (God's written Word) itself are liars, by saying that Mary was a perpetual virgin? There was nothing supernatural about her other children's births.

The pope has told you that only people who believe him will not burn in hell-fire?

Should you believe a person or any organisation that teaches you LIES and put your life and death into the hands of people who tell you lies?

Don't you think that believing lies and gambling your soul on the word of people who tell lies is rather mis-guided and foolish, to put it mildly?

Wouldn't it be much safer to reject lies and believe the TRUTH? What does Jesus' apostle, whom he chose specially and blinded; Paul, of the road to Damascus fame, say on the subject?

Paul's second letter to the Thessalonians
2:7 For the mystery (Rev./Apoc. 17:5) of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth [will let], until he (the son of perdition) be taken out of the way.
2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the [Sword of the] Spirit (The TRUTH or Word of God) from his mouth, and shall destroy (Rev./Apoc. 17 and 18) with the enlightening of his coming:
2:9 [Even the Wicked], whose coming is the work of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the Truth, that they might be saved.
2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe A LIE:
2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the Truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness (and lies - Rev./Apoc. 21:8).
2:13 But we are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the Truth:

Don't you think it would be wiser to believe the written Word of God (the TRUTH) than to believe people who tell you that the written Word of God is a lie?

Satan, the serpent in the Garden of Eden, told you, then, that God was a liar and that he was telling you the truth and you believed him and since then you have all been getting sick and dying, exactly as God (Who is THE TRUTH) told you.

Anyone who tells you that God is a liar is obviously working for Satan the devil (liar in Hebrew). How long would YOU employ someone who called YOU a liar?

Who do you think, now, in the Light of this EVIDENCE, the pope and his employees are REALLY working for? Remember it's your life.

The Celts are Israelites under another Name.

The word Celt is the Anglicised form of the Greek word Keltoi, which means "the people who are different.*" In Scripture, all nations, except the Twelve Tribes of Israel, are referred to as Gentiles (Foreigners), so the only people who are different are Israel. The word Celt is therefore another word for Israelite. The Celts are part of the Ten "lost" Tribes of Israel; as are the Tuatha de Danaan and Milesians. The Irish people are a mixture of Celts; Danaans; Milesians; Judah/Zarahites (of the "Red Hand" - Genesis 38:28-30§); (Dan-ish) Vikings and Norsemen and are all racially cousins.

* Deuteronomy 14:2 For thou [art] an holy people unto the "I AM" thy God, and the "I AM" hath chosen thee to be a peculiar* people unto Himself, above all the nations that [are] upon the earth.

§ Genesis 38:28 And it came to pass, when she travailed, that [the one] put out [his] hand: and the midwife took and bound upon his hand a scarlet thread, saying, This came out first.
38:29 And it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his brother came out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? Why has thou made [this] breach against thee? Therefore his name was called Pharez (Breach).
38:30 And afterward came out his brother, that had the scarlet thread upon his hand: and his name was called Zarah (Scarlet).
Therefore the Celts, according to God, are Israelites.

The Irish Celts held three sacred assemblies every year at Tara§ during Bealtaine; Lughnasadh and Samhain which assured an abundance of corn and milk; freedom from conquest; the enjoyment of Righteous Laws; comfort in every house; fruit in great abundance, and plenty of fish in their lakes, rivers, and estuaries, exactly as God guaranteed Israel in The Torah/Tara, if they kept The Covenant. Also, during the Feast of Tara/Torah the kings of Ireland used to settle the affairs of Ireland for seven years, so that debts, suits and adjustments used not to be submitted for judgement until the next feast, seven years later, which the Torah calls the 'Year of the "I AM's" Release'** when all debts were forgiven, every seven years. This proves that Irish Celtic law was based on The Torah and is further confirmation that the Celts are Israelites.

** Deuteronomy 15:1 At the end of [every] seven years thou shalt make a release.
15:2 And this [is] the manner of the release: Every creditor that lendeth [ought] unto his neighbour shall release [it]; he shall not exact [it] of his neighbour, or of his brother; because it is called the "I AM"'s release.

§ Deuteronomy 16:16 Three times in a year shall all thy males appear before the "I AM" thy God in the place which He shall choose; in the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and in the Feast of Weeks, and in the Feast of Tabernacles: and they shall not appear before the "I AM" empty:
16:17 Every man [shall give] as he is able, according to the blessing of the "I AM" thy God which He hath given thee (corn; milk; fish; etc.; etc.; etc.).
16:18 Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates, which the "I AM" thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes: and they shall judge the people with just Judgment.
16:19 Thou shalt not pervert Judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous.
16:20 That which is totally just shalt thou follow, that thou mayest live, and inherit the land which the "I AM" thy God giveth thee.

Also the word British is not English; it is Hebrew.
Brit (Berit) means Covenant in Hebrew and Welsh
Ish means man or people of, in Hebrew and English
Therefore British means The People of The Covenant,
in other words, the People Israel of The Covenant.

The Irish people have rejected the English (Davidic) monarchy and its ANTI-Covenant laws and that is good; very good.
However, the Celtish / Irish people are Israelites descended from Jacob/Israel's fifth of his twelve sons, who was called Dan and fathered the Tuatha de Danaan - the Tribe of Dan (the Irish and Danish). Therefore the Irish people are Celtish / British-Israelites by birth i.e. People of The Covenant in the Torah in the Bible and in The Ark, which is buried at Tara.
Reject the House of Windsor's ANTI-Covenant and therefore illegal laws (Deuteronomy 4:2), by all means possible, but do not reject your birthright as Israelites and British people, with YOUR own emblem the War Queen of Ireland, with Trident and Olive Twig - Teia Tephi.
Tephi, symbolised by Britannia, the sixth century B.C. queen of all Ireland.
If you reject your Birth-Right as Israelites, you are insulting God Who gave your Birthright to you, along with The Covenant.
Ireland is also called Hibernia - Hebernia from Heber/Eber the great grand-dad of Abraham who was the grand-dad of Jacob/Israel from whom the Celts are descended.

Hebernia (Ireland) means Hebrew's new land.
Heberia - Iberia (Spain) means Hebrew's land.
The Basque; Galician; Asturian and Guipuzcoan Celts are your cousins.

https://fraudinthelegalsystem.wordpress.com/2016/03/05/fraud-in-gibraltars-legal-system/#comment-5

Fraudulently Charged in Gibraltar for “Not Having a Valid Permit”

http://jahtalk.thefarrellreport.net/

JAHTALK THIS WEBSITE CARRIES A COVENANT HEALTH WARNING IGNORING CAN KILL

https://uniquehornreport.wordpress.com/2016/08/07/learning-to-wield-the-sword-of-truth/

Learning to Wield The Sword of Truth

https://hannahmichaels.wordpress.com/2015/09/16/holy-lamb-of-god-seen-on-englands-mountains-green/

Inspired by William Blake’s poem “Prelude to Milton” and its treasured song “Jerusalem

https://hannahmichaels.wordpress.com/2016/07/15/the-scriptural-marks-of-christ/

Whereby We May Know Him During His Second Coming

http://gibraltarmessenger.net/

Statement of Facts

My name is Crown Prince Michael, also known as Archangel Michael, and the Christ/ Messiah, and I am older than this world (John 17:5), but the human body that I am inhabiting, on this my Second Coming incarnated into a human, inside a new body from the Tribe of Joseph-Ephraim, exactly as prophesied in the Holy Bible, is 70 years of age

The Birth of Jesus the Nazarite at Passover in 7 B.C..

THE AUTHOR IS JESUS+CHRIST, HIS BIRTH AND DEATH IS WRITTEN BY  Crown Prince Michael, also known as Archangel Michael, and the Christ/ Messiah,AND THAT IS A FACT

    

THE RISE AND FALL OF AMERICA.

THE RISE AND FALL OF AMERICA.

America is heading for major disaster.

THE RISE AND FALL OF AMERICA.

America is heading for major disaster.

Written by Matthew Browne

The President of United States and the Rogue Supreme Judges have conspired to destroy the (counterfeit) constitution of America. They have been planning this for a long time but God has not permitted them to do it unto now, you will see it happen 2018.

 There are two reasons why they want to destroy it. (1) So they can start and create One World Government that will be run by their man, which is the anti- Christ who will be most likely come to power sometime from 2018 to 2021. You cannot have two world powers competing, therefore, America as a super power must be destroyed. (2) First destroy the (counterfeit) constitution so they can disarm the general public of their right to carry guns. The Americans won’t take this sitting down; they will fight this Presidential Ruling for the next seven years!!

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1868.htm

Therefore, the President will declare Martial Law and will use one million United Nations armed forces to fulfil their wicked plans. They will destroy greatly; 20% Americans will be arrested and thrown into concentration camps, many to never to be released.

http://jediknightsquad.blogspot.com.au/2016/09/hidden-agendas-of-secret-societies.html

 Most of them will be raped and murdered in satanic rituals to give more power to those who believe in a New World Order. If there is no constitution, there will be no access to judges, lawyers or a fair trial. Because of this situation arising, the U.S. Government will start to weaken and it strength as a super power will self-destruct; slavery and marshal law will be implemented.

The President acts if he is a God, The President acts if he is a King,

The President acts if he is a Christian. What do you think? Is he!

The Presidents Administration think they are above the law (Torah, God’s law) and also the rogue Judges think so too. This is known as sedition, Satan did this a long time ago and God threw him out of heaven because he wanted to be a God and a King.

The American Public have failed to stand for Truth and because of this the Obama Administration has almost-they have already destroyed the (counterfeit) constitution One day soon the President with just one stroke of his gold pen (no need to, since 9/11 he said I AM ABOVE THE LAW,-I make my laws, I will make the (Counterfeit) constitution obsolete. Why, Has He not done that already?  The President and the rogue Judges have been elected to serve the American Public. The constitution was written for all 322,583,006 American Publics benefit.

http://www.activistpost.com/2016/10/5-triggering-events-place-u-s-martial-law.html?

So they could live in peace, have freedom and be protected from evil men. But evil men in high places have been corrupted by power, lust, greed and making a name for themselves. Pride comes before a fall. God in his wisdom will let evil men reign but shortly He will judge all nations according to their actions and motives. America is going fast towards a major downfall.

Shredding the Magna Carta

OBAMA-TRUMP HAS A Military Industrial Complex, IN OTHER WORDS HE IS INSANE, CRAZY AND A RUTHLESS DICTATOR. OBAMA+TRUMP IS THE CAUSE OF THE WAR TO COME and all 7.25 billion of us human+beings will suffer directly because of him.

you must understand that Obama is ONLY a puppet on a string, he has no power whatsoever. The real power is satan, the devil where all evil flows from...PERIOD.

Russia Issues Full-Scale War Alert As West Faces Financial Armageddon

The Obama+TRUMP Administration wants to rip up not just the Bill of Rights. It's going after the Magna Carta, too. It wants to do away with habeas corpus, the essential, 800-year-old right that allows the accused to appear before a judge and plead.

One night, probably in 1880, John Swinton, then the pre-eminent New York journalist, was the guest of honour at a banquet given him by the leaders of his craft. Someone who knew neither the press nor Swinton offered a toast to the independent press. Swinton outraged his colleagues by replying:

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.

There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.

"The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread.

You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?

We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."

CHAPTER ONE

Text of the Magna Carta

As might be expected, the text of the Magna Carta of 1215 bears many traces of haste, and is clearly the product of much bargaining and many hands. Most of its clauses deal with specific, and often long-standing, grievances rather than with general principles of law. Some of the grievances are self-explanatory: others can be understood only in the context of the feudal society in which they arose. Of a few clauses, the precise meaning is still a matter of argument.

In feudal society, the king's barons held their lands `in fee' (feudum) from the king, for an oath to him of loyalty and obedience, and with the obligation to provide him with a fixed number of knights whenever these were required for military service. At first the barons provided the knights by dividing their estates (of which the largest and most important were known as `honours') into smaller parcels described as `knights' fees', which they distributed to tenants able to serve as knights. But by the time of King John it had become more convenient and usual for the obligation for service to be commuted for a cash payment known as `scutage', and for the revenue so obtained to be used to maintain paid armies.

Besides military service, feudal custom allowed the king to make certain other exactions from his barons. In times of emergency, and on such special occasions as the marriage of his eldest daughter, he could demand from them a financial levy known as an `aid' (auxilium).

When a baron died, he could demand a succession duty or `relief' (relevium) from the baron's heir. If there was no heir, or if the succession was disputed, the baron's lands could be forfeited or `escheated' to the Crown. If the heir was under age, the king could assume the guardianship of his estates, and enjoy all the profits from them-ven to the extent of despoliation-until the heir came of age.

 The king had the right, if he chose, to sell such a guardianship to the highest bidder, and to sell the heir himself in marriage for such price as the value of his estates would command. The widows and daughters of barons might also be sold in marriage. With their own tenants, the barons could deal similarly.

The scope for extortion and abuse in this system, if it were not benevolently applied, was obviously great and had been the subject of complaint long before King John came to the throne. Abuses were, moreover, aggravated by the difficulty of obtaining redress for them, and in Magna Carta the provision of the means for obtaining a fair hearing of complaints, not only against the king and his agents but against lesser feudal lords, achieves corresponding importance.

About two-thirds of the clauses of the Magna Carta of 1215 are concerned with matters such as these and with the misuse of their powers by royal officials. As regards other topics, the first clause, conceding the freedom of the Church, and in particular confirming its right to elect its own dignitaries without royal interference, reflects John's dispute with the Pope over Stephen Langton's election as archbishop of Canterbury:

 it does not appear in the Articles of the Barons, and its somewhat stilted phrasing seems in part to be attempting to justify its inclusion, none the less, in the charter itself. The clauses that deal with the royal forests), over which the king had special powers and jurisdiction, reflect the disquiet and anxieties that had arisen on account of a longstanding royal tendency to extend the forest boundaries, to the detriment of the holders of the lands affected.

 Those that deal with debts reflect administrative problems created by the chronic scarcity of ready cash among the upper and middle classes, and their need to resort to money-lenders when this was required. The clause promising the removal of fish-weirs was intended to facilitate the navigation of rivers.

 A number of clauses deal with the special circumstances that surrounded the making of the charter, and are such as might be found in any treaty of peace. Others, such as those relating to the city of London and to merchants clearly represent concessions to special interests.

Magna Carta and Its American Legacy

Before penning the Declaration of Independence--the first of the American Charters of Freedom--in 1776, the Founding Fathers searched for a historical precedent for asserting their rightful liberties from King George III and the English Parliament.

They found it in a gathering that took place 561 years earlier on the plains of Runnymede, not far from where Windsor Castle stands today. There, on June 15, 1215, an assembly of barons confronted a despotic and cash-strapped King John and demanded that traditional rights be recognized, written down, confirmed with the royal seal, and sent to each of the counties to be read to all freemen. The result was Magna Carta--a momentous achievement for the English barons and, nearly six centuries later, an inspiration for angry American colonists.

Magna Carta was the result of the Angevin king's disastrous foreign policy and overzealous financial administration. John had suffered a staggering blow the previous year, having lost an important battle to King Philip II at Bouvines and with it all hope of regaining the French lands he had inherited.

When the defeated John returned from the Continent, he attempted to rebuild his coffers by demanding scutage (a fee paid in lieu of military service) from the barons who had not joined his war with Philip.

 The barons in question, predominantly lords of northern estates, protested, condemning John's policies and insisting on a reconfirmation of Henry I's Coronation Oath (1100), which would, in theory, limit the king's ability to obtain funds. (As even Henry ignored the provisions of this charter, however, a reconfirmation would not necessarily guarantee fewer taxes.) But John refused to withdraw his demands, and by spring most baronial families began to take sides.

 The rebelling barons soon faltered before John's superior resources, but with the unexpected capture of London, they earned a substantial bargaining chip. John agreed to grant a charter.

The document conceded by John and set with his seal in 1215, however, was not what we know today as Magna Carta but rather a set of baronial stipulations, now lost, known as the "Articles of the barons." After John and his barons agreed on the final provisions and additional wording changes, they issued a formal version on June 19, and it is this document that came to be known as Magna Carta. Of great significance to future generations was a minor wording change, the replacement of the term "any baron" with "any freeman" in stipulating to whom the provisions applied.

Over time, it would help justify the application of the Charter's provisions to a greater part of the population. While freemen were a minority in 13th-century England, the term would eventually include all English, just as "We the People" would come to apply to all Americans in this century.

While Magna Carta would one day become a basic document of the British Constitution, democracy and universal protection of ancient liberties were not among the barons' goals. The Charter was a feudal document and meant to protect the rights and property of the few powerful families that topped the rigidly structured feudal system.

 In fact, the majority of the population, the thousands of unfree labourers, are only mentioned once, in a clause concerning the use of court-set fines to punish minor offences. Magna Carta's primary purpose was restorative: to force King John to recognize the supremacy of ancient liberties, to limit his ability to raise funds, and to reassert the principle of "due process."

Only a final clause, which created an enforcement council of tenants-in-chief, and clergymen, would have severely limited the king's power and introduced something new to English law: the principle of "majority rule." But majority rule was an idea whose time had not yet come; in September, at John's urging, Pope Innocent II annulled the "shameful and demeaning agreement, forced upon the king by violence and fear." The civil war that followed ended only with John's death in October 1216.

On indefinite loan from the Perot Foundation, a 1297 version of Magna Carta shares space with the Charters of Freedom in the National Archives Rotunda.

To gain support for the new monarch--John's 9-year-old son, Henry III--the young king's regents reissued the charter in 1217.

Neither this version nor that issued by Henry when he assumed personal control of the throne in 1225 were exact duplicates of John's charter; both lacked some provisions, including that providing for the enforcement council, found in the original. With the 1225 issuance, however, the evolution of the document ended.

While English monarchs, including Henry, confirmed Magna Carta several times after this, each subsequent issue followed the form of this "final" version. With each confirmation, copies of the document were made and sent to the counties so that everyone would know their rights and obligations. Of these original issues of Magna Carta, 17 survive: 4 from the reign of John; 8 from that of Henry III; and 5 from Edward I, including the version now on display at the National Archives.

Although tradition and interpretation would one day make Magna Carta a document of great importance to both England and the American colonies, it originally granted concessions to few but the powerful baronial families. It did include concessions to the Church, merchants, townsmen, and the lower aristocracy for their aid in the rebellion, but the majority of the English population would remain without an active voice in government for another 700 years.

Despite its historical significance, however, Magna Carta may have remained legally inconsequential had it not been resurrected and reinterpreted by Sir Edward Coke in the early 17th century. Coke, Attorney General for Elizabeth, Chief Justice during the reign of James, and a leader in Parliament in opposition to Charles I, used Magna Carta as a weapon against the oppressive tactics of the Stuart kings. Coke argued that even kings must comply to common law. As he proclaimed to Parliament in 1628, "Magna Carta . . . will have no sovereign."

Lord Coke's view of the law was particularly relevant to the American experience for it was during this period that the charters for the colonies were written. Each included the guarantee that those sailing for the New World and their heirs would have "all the rights and immunities of free and natural subjects." As our forefathers developed legal codes for the colonies, many incorporated liberties guaranteed by Magna Carta and the 1689 English Bill of Rights directly into their own statutes. Although few colonists could afford legal training in England, they remained remarkably familiar with English common law. During one parliamentary debate in the late 18th century, Edmund Burke observed, "In no country, perhaps in the world, is law so general a study."

 Through Coke, whose four-volume Institutes of the Laws of England was widely read by American law students, young colonists such as John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison learned of the spirit of the charter and the common law--or at least Coke's interpretation of them. Later, Jefferson would write to Madison of Coke: "a sounder whig never wrote, nor of profounder learning in the orthodox doctrines of the British constitution, or in what were called English liberties." It is no wonder then that as the colonists prepared for war they would look to Coke and Magna Carta for justification.

By the 1760s the colonists had come to believe that in America they were creating a place that adopted the best of the English system but adapted it to new circumstances; a place where a person could rise by merit, not birth; a place where men could voice their opinions and actively share in self-government.

 But these beliefs were soon tested. Following the costly Seven Years' War, Great Britain was burdened with substantial debts and the continuing expense of keeping troops on American soil. Parliament thought the colonies should finance much of their own defence and levied the first direct tax, the Stamp Act, in 1765. As a result, virtually every document--newspapers, licenses, insurance policies, legal writs, even playing cards--would have to carry a stamp showing that required taxes had been paid. The colonists rebelled against such control over their daily affairs.

Their own elected legislative bodies had not been asked to consent to the Stamp Act. The colonists argued that without either this local consent or direct representation in Parliament, the act was "taxation without representation." They also objected to the law's provision that those who disobeyed could be tried in admiralty courts without a jury of their peers. Coke's influence on Americans showed clearly when the Massachusetts Assembly reacted by declaring the Stamp Act "against the Magna Carta and the natural rights of Englishmen, and therefore, according to Lord Coke, null and void."

But regardless of whether the charter forbade taxation without representation or if this was merely implied by the "spirit," the colonists used this "misinterpretation" to condemn the Stamp Act. To defend their objections, they turned to a 1609 or 1610 defence argument used by Coke: superiority of the common law over acts of Parliament. Coke claimed "When an act of parliament is against common right or reason, or repugnant, or impossible to be performed, the common law will control it and adjudge such an act void. Because the Stamp Act seemed to tread on the concept of consensual taxation, the colonists believed it, "according to Lord Coke," invalid.

The colonists were enraged. Benjamin Franklin and others in England eloquently argued the American case, and Parliament quickly rescinded the bill. But the damage was done; the political climate was changing. As John Adams later wrote to Thomas Jefferson, "The Revolution was in the minds of the people, and this was affected, from 1760 to 1775, in the course of 15 years before a drop of blood was shed at Lexington."

Relations between Great Britain and the colonies continued to deteriorate. The more Parliament tried to raise revenue and suppress the growing unrest, the more the colonists demanded the charter rights they had brought with them a century and a half earlier. At the height of the Stamp Act crisis, William Pitt proclaimed in Parliament,

 "The Americans are the sons not the bastards of England." Parliament and the Crown, however, appeared to believe otherwise. But the Americans would have their rights, and they would fight for them. The seal adopted by Massachusetts on the eve of the Revolution summed up the mood--a militiaman with sword in one hand and Magna Carta in the other.

Armed resistance broke out in April 1775. Fifteen months later, the final break was made with the immortal words of the Declaration of Independence:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness." Although the colonies had finally and irrevocably articulated their goal, Independence did not come swiftly. Not until the surrender of British forces at Yorktown in 1781 was the military struggle won. The constitutional battle, however, was just beginning.

In the war's aftermath, many Americans recognized that the rather loose confederation of states would have to be strengthened if the new nation were to survive. James Madison expressed these concerns in a call for a convention at Philadelphia in 1787 to revise the Articles of Confederation: "The good people of America are to decide the solemn question, whether they will by wise and magnanimous efforts reap the just fruits of that Independence which they so gloriously acquired . . . or whether by giving way to unmanly jealousies and prejudices, or to partial and transitory interests, they will renounce the auspicious blessings prepared for them by the Revolution."

 The representatives of the states listened to Madison and drew heavily from his ideas. Instead of revising the Articles, they created a new form of government, embodied in the Constitution of the United States. Authority emanated directly from the people, not from any governmental body. And the Constitution would be "the supreme Law of the Land"--just as Magna Carta had been deemed superior to other statutes.

Conclusion

In 1215, when King John confirmed Magna Carta with his seal, he was acknowledging the now firmly embedded concept that no man--not even the king--is above the law. That was a milestone in constitutional thought for the 13th century and for centuries to come. In 1779 John Adams expressed it this way: "A government of laws, and not of men." Further, the charter established important individual rights that have a direct legacy in the American Bill of Rights. And during the United States' history, these rights have been expanded. The U.S. Constitution is not a static document.

(1)  Like Magna Carta, it has been interpreted and reinterpreted throughout the years. This has allowed the Constitution to become the longest-lasting constitution in the world and a model for those penned by other nations.

(2)   Through judicial review and amendment, it has evolved (2) so that today Americans--regardless of gender, race, or creed—

(3)  can enjoy the liberties (3)

(4)   and protection (4) it guarantees. Just as Magna Carta stood as a bulwark against tyranny in England, the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights today serve similar roles,

(5)  protecting the individual freedoms of all Americans against arbitrary (5)

(6)   and capricious  (6) rule.     

                                                                                                                    

The conclusion is the biggest fat lie invented by man. If you believe what has been written to be true, then you have been robbed by the anti-christ deception already.

 To explain myself I will relate it to the Character of God and His Laws that never change.

(1)       The U.S. Constitution is not a static document. It should be static but you have rogue judges that have destroyed it. However, the Word of God is static. It never changes, God’s Ten Commandments have never changed but man’s view of them has.

(2)       Evolved? The Character of God and His Laws have never evolved or changed. His Laws are a written Testament against the wickedness of men’s hearts.

(3)       Liberties? America is enslaved to greed, lust and is full of pride. They are marching to a major downfall. True freedom is found in Jesus Christ and His Precious Blood that washes away our sin.

(4)       Protection? If you want protection, weather you are guilty or innocent, money is the key to everything so they think. The innocent suffer while evil men get promoted. The Lord is my Shepherd, I shall lack nothing. Psalm 23:  His Angels will place a guard around me and protect me from the wicked one. Psalm 91:

(5)       Arbitrary/ Autocrat. A ruler who has absolute power. Such as a dictatorship. Supreme Judges and the President of U.S.A. right now have absolute power; therefore, they are the dictators of American laws and policies. The true King is Yahshua. Follow Him.

(6)       Capricious; given to sudden and unaccountable changes of mood or behaviour. Today’s politicians can never agree on anything worthy and change their minds so much; they don’t know what they believe. Their morals and ethics are corrupt and can base their values on nothing positive. However, God’s Character and Word is positive and will never be corrupted.

http://www.jahtruth.net/defin.htm 

CHAPTER TWO

THE ROGUE JUDGES

Rogue Judges have been strangling U.S.A. democracy for 200 years.

Sometime in the past an unknown Supreme Judge has made a wild claim that the Supreme Building is like the Pagan Temple of Kaknak and the Supreme Court Judges are the High Priests and the other Judges are the Priests of a Civic Religion. Supposedly, they have priestly clothes, ceremonies and a counterfeit bible which is the bogus constitution which has been written by the rogues Judges.

They want us to believe that the constitution evolves over time by good and loving Judges that meet the needs of the American people. Someone is pulling the wool over your eyes if you believe that.

Niccole Machiavelli, an Italian bureaucrat, wrote a book called “The Prince” in the time of Shakespeare. http://www.jahtruth.net/defin.htm

This book has been a blueprint for dictators such as Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin, Stalin and the entire rogue Supreme Judges. Niccole was only interested in how to gain power. Moral and ethics and the lore of the land was the last thing on his mind, therefore you end up with evil men in high positions who hate good and love evil.

In 1795, the Georgia Legislative sold 35,000,000 acres of state-owned land to four New England Companies at a price of 1.5 cents per acre. This was a fraudulent sale so these Companies sold it quickly to speculators who resold it too. Then they all played the innocent game and looked surprised when a law was passed declaring their titles invalid.

A rogue Supreme Judge by the name of John Marshall resided over the case and found in his own counterfeit constitution it was ok to steal the land from the American people. By the way, he wrote many counterfeits into the real constitution. John Marshall died in 1835 and in is honour they rung the liberty bell. It is said that the bell suffered a giant crack in its side and has been silent ever since. So be it.

American Civil War

Dread Scott was an elderly slave who sued his owner, named Sandford, for his freedom. They had lived for some time in the Wisconsin Territory. In the 1820, congress had enacted a law that forbade slavery in that Territory. The rogue Judges in looking for an excuse for their actions focused on the idea that slaves were property of the landlord. The Firth Amendment says that nobody could be deprived of “life, liberty, property, without due process of the law”.

 These Judges wanted complete power, so in the process they threw out the 1820 law and said it was unconstitutional. What gives them the right to create laws out of nothing?

Legislatures have control over the substance of the laws and the courts controlled the processes by which the laws are applied to individual cases. Abraham Lincoln not to be out done said in a speech in 1859. “The people of these united states are the rightful masters of both congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who would pervert the Constitution”.

The 1860 election was followed by the civil war. The Southerners thought the constitution was on their side. Truth and Justice were on their side for the bogus high priests of the Supreme Court had told them so. For the South, the civil war was insane but they had fallen for the biggest lie ever invented, that slaves are the property of landlords. Dream on, get real, and get a life. Rogue Judges are the ones fully responsible for the 500,000 dead and 500,000 wounded in the civil war.

In December, 1866, The Washington Chronicle wrote that “treason had found a refuge in the bosom of the Supreme Court of the United States.”

In April, 1867, The Independent wrote that the “Supreme Court was regarded as a diseased member of the body politic and was risking amputation.”

These rogue Judges found in their counterfeit constitution it was okay to have abortions even though all states had laws against it. They also tied up police hands with crazy laws which caused over 100,000 murders and 500,000 rapes and also had a hand in the cause of the Great Depression.

CHAPTER THREE

YOU HAVE BEEN CONNED

ALL Constitutions THAT ARE Written BY MAN ARE ALL ILLEGAL

America, Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand and all other countries that have a written constitution by man are all counterfeits of the real.

There is only one constitution that is written by Lord God (Guardian of Divinity) and that is which is to be found in the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Heaven. There is only one supreme King and Master that rules overall and that is your real Father “Yahweh” as known to the HOUSE of Israel and “I AM” as known to the non-Jew. The Torah and the Logos are the only legal constitution that our real Father has ever let man to live by and DO.  Any other constitution is a counterfeit and you have all been conned. (con-stitution).

Just encase you do not understand, you must live by the ten commandments which include all 613 laws given to the HOUSE of Israel through Moses direct from your real Father in Heaven. Your real Father then sent his only well beloved Son who came in the body (human) known as Yahshua who gave two more commands which all humans must live by.

All rules and laws that are invented and created by man that contradict and are the opposite of what Yahweh has said in His written constitution the TORAH will have to pay the penalty of death. All prime ministers and presidents, kings and queens that rule over men, whether it is governments or kingdoms, God will hold all of them accountable for treason and they will all face the fire and will all die.

Any man who uses these counterfeit laws to bring judgments against the guilty or innocent will be accountable to God for treason.

I am referring to the Supreme Court and all judges, lawyers, barristers, Justice Department and prosecutors will be accountable to God for treason.

Any man who is considering being a judge, lawyer, barrister, and work for the Justice department and is willing to contradict and do the opposite of the TORAH will be accountable to God for treason. Please reconsider and work for your real Father by building the KINGDOM OF GOD ON EARTH ON HIS TERMS AS IT IS WRITTEN IN THE TORAH. By doing this and living according to the TORAH and by every WORD that proceeds out of the mouth of “I AM” you shall live and have eternal live.

Any person that does not live by every WORD that proceeds out of the mouth of Yahweh shall face the fire and will all die – no exceptions.

For it says in Deuteronomy 4:2 where it states plainly we are not to add or detract not even one letter from THE Law/God's Laws. Also I would like to point out that when Jesus came He said, "I am not come to destroy the prophets or the Law. I am not come to destroy but FULFILL the Law".

Now I am going to give evidence that all HUMAN BEINGS that I have listed above are all liars and deceivers and not one of them cares about any kind of justice at all. They should all be locked up and all the innocent human beings that they have caused to be put in jails under their counterfeit laws should be released and given their freedom.

Any human being that lives by the Torah are free indeed of man’s laws, amen.

Here is a list of all those who have been murdered or put in prison for no good reason. They have NEVER had a TRAIL by a JURY. The evidence is planted by corrupt police, CIA and FBI.(MI 5 and MI 6)

The Levitical Priesthood of Tennessee

A preacher approached me in Swanee, Tennessee some years ago and asked me if it was true that I practiced the Law of Moses. I replied that it was true. His next question was if I practiced the sacrificial laws. Perceiving his craftiness by asking this forked question, I asked him if he practiced the Levitical Priesthood in Tennessee. He emphatically denied that he did any such thing, and proceeded to preach me a true fire and brimstone sermon about Christ Crucified and how Jesus did away with the Law of Moses in general, and the sacrificial laws in particular.

Seeing that the man was a Christian in distress over doctrine, I apologized for my outrageous suggestion that HE, of all people, might be a practicioner of the sacrificial system of Tennessee, explaining that I was a stranger from a far, far land called Missouri, and that I had heard the people of Tennessee practiced the Levitical Priesthood, complete with sacrifices and heave offerings, but they called it another name, the 'Judicial System.' As he stared at me for a few minutes, like I'd just announced that I'd taken a ride in a UFO, I asked if they had a Highway Patrol in Tennessee. He said they did, and after a few more questions, it came out that they also had police, lawyers, judges, courts, courthouses, courtrooms complete with bars and benches and, even, fines for criminal activities; the sum total of which constituted the judicial system of the State of Tennessee. Looking at him, I said that the stories I'd heard were true, that the people of Tennessee were indeed a religious lot, which lead him to ask how having police and all the rest was religious. So I told him a story.

Let's say that one day you decide to take a drive, and an ever vigilant policeman sees you tooling along at 80 MPH in a 55 MPH zone, so he takes off after you, and pulls you over. Asking for your driver's license, he notes that it doesn't give you permission to drive 80 MPH in a 55 MPH zone, so he arrests you and hauls you off to the nearest jail. From there, you're brought to the courthouse and into a courtroom, where you face a judge sitting on a bench behind a bar. You're stood beside your lawyer, who enters a plea of guilty, which makes you a criminal. The judge levies a fine and court costs. If you don't like the decision, you can appeal, if necessary all the way to the Supreme Court. So what you have are the civil servants of the State of Tennessee performing their jobs, which constitute the judicial system of the State of Tennessee.

In olden days, this system wasn't called the judicial system, it was called the Levtical Priesthood, and it worked the same way.

Today's policeman was known as the High Priest's servant. As such, he was constantly on the lookout for sin, which is the transgression of the Law (1John 3:4). When he uncovered a sin, he hauled the sinner off to the temple ward, which is today's courthouse/jail combination. Modern courthouses are designed like temples, even to the point of sitting in the town square, so that everything in town revolves around them. The temple is where the High Priest conducted the sacrifices in the Holy Place. It was easy to recognize the High Priest going about his duties because of his long, flowing, often black, robes. When he had to sit in judgement on a sinner, he would go to the Holy Place and go behind the altar, which was behind the veil to the Holy Place. Sound anything like a judge entering a courtroom, and sitting on his bench, which is behind the bar? In order for a sinner to pass through the veil and approach the High Priest required an intercessor, who helped in your prayer to the High Priest concerning your sin. Sound like a lawyer entering a plea? When the accused admitted his guilt, he became a sinner. The High Priest then commanded him to perform penance, oftimes in the form of sacrifices, which he called a sin offering. He would also impose a heave offering, to reimburse him for his time. Sounds more and more like a modern court, with you entering a plea of guilty, and having fines and court costs levied. If the sinner thought the High Priest was not acting properly, he could go before the Aaronic Priesthood, if necessary all the way to Moses, which is essentially the same as going through the court of appeals to the Supreme Court. So, what you had were the Levites of Israel performing their jobs which constituted the Levitical Priesthood of Israel. What's the phrase, 'a rose by any other name...?'

So, I closed by chiding this Christian preacher a little, reminding him that he practices the sacrificial system of the State of Tennessee every time he goes into court. Remember, Tennessee is a sovereign, sovereigns make laws, lawmakers are gods, violating laws is sin, sins require sacrifice as a matter of law, either Civil or Common, and people who practice the religion of the United States make sacrifices to their god, voluntarily or involuntarily.

The Levitical Priesthood Of Tennessee

The Police = The High Priest's Servants

Crimes = Sins

The Jail = The Ward

The Courthouse = The Temple

The Courtroom = The Holy Place

The Judge = The High Priest

The Bench = The Altar

The Bar = The Veil

Lawyers = Intercessors

Pleas = Prayers

Being Guilty of a Crime = Being Guilty of a Sin

Criminals = Sinners

Fines = Sin Offerings

Court Costs = Heave Offering

The Supreme Court = The Holy of Holies

The Judicial System = The Levitical Priesthood